A local woman has been fined almost $115,000 over an unauthorised development on Rachel Street, Murray Bridge; the penalty would later be reduced on appeal.
A comment on this post has been removed, not because it contained criticism of Murray Bridge News but because it could have been construed, in part, as being in contempt of the court.
Great article. On enquiring, the Rural City Of Murray Bridge Development Enforcement Policy suggest that this would not have been a matter bought before the ERD Court. Looking at the facts surrounding this matter, I was able to determine that the precedents suggest a $3000 fine and a good behaviour bond. A $115K fine would suggests that some information is not stated in your article. Will you be doing any investigative journalism for this story? Also, If there is an appeal in the Supreme Court, will you be covering it?
A comment on this post has been removed, not because it contained criticism of Murray Bridge News but because it could have been construed, in part, as being in contempt of the court.
Great article. On enquiring, the Rural City Of Murray Bridge Development Enforcement Policy suggest that this would not have been a matter bought before the ERD Court. Looking at the facts surrounding this matter, I was able to determine that the precedents suggest a $3000 fine and a good behaviour bond. A $115K fine would suggests that some information is not stated in your article. Will you be doing any investigative journalism for this story? Also, If there is an appeal in the Supreme Court, will you be covering it?